ISIS, Their Moral Downfall And Physical Downfall
10 August 2016By Al-Ikhwah Al-Mujahidun
ISIS was struck with madness in Takfir and exceeded the limits of extremism
when they slandered the chaste wives of the Mujahideen from Jabhat Nusra and
others saying that they are fornicators (if they stayed with their husbands),
and before that they slandered Al-Qaedah saying that it is like an adulteress
claiming to be chaste. This is the level they have stooped to, and this is the
swamp they cultivate. So is this the Prophetic Caliphate?
Like I said before, them killing Shaykh Abu Khalid Al-Suri, may Allah have
mercy on him, reminds me of the murder of the two Mashayikh Muhammad Saeed and
Abdur-Razzaaq Rajjaam and their brothers in Algeria. The murder of the two
Mashayikh and their brothers represented the moral downfall followed by the
physical downfall of the GIA in Algeria. Likewise I consider the murder of Abu
Khalid Al-Suri, may Allah have mercy upon him, to represent the moral downfall
of his killers, which is often followed by a physical downfall.
May Allah have mercy upon you oh Abu Khalid (..poetry). The murder of Abu
Khalid Al-Suri, may Allah have mercy upon him, exposed an aspect of the
wickedness of the modern day Takfiri extremists. There is a difference between
them and the first Khawarij. The first Khawarij would declare and brag about
what they did. When Abdu Rahmaan ibn Muljim struck Sayyidna Ali ibn Abi Talib,
may Allah be pleased with him, with a sword, he screamed out: ''There is no
rule except for Allah, it is not for you Ali nor your companions!'' As for
these, they kill and execute, then they do not find the courage of the first
Khawarij in themselves, because they are cowards who are not able to declare
what they did, so that their true face does not become exposed. The murderers
of Abu Khalid Al-Suri, may Allah be pleased with him, are cowards! They
encourage other misguided ones to kill, but they keep quite about their deeds.
In addition to this difference which was exposed by the murder of Abu Khalid,
there are other differences as well. The first Khawarij considered lying to be
disbelief, as for the modern day Takfiri extremists, lying is their common
trait. Even their leaders are not ashamed to lie, even against themselves. One
of them declares something (Abu Muhammad Al-Adnani), then he denies it without
any shame in front of everyone. The first Khawarij considered breaking oaths
to be disbelief, as for the modern day Takfiri extremists, they consider
hopping from oath to oath to be political cleverness in their thirsty desire
for authority. The first Khawarij made Takfir on the basis of sins, as for the
modern day Takfiri extremists, they make Takfir on the basis of lies,
fabrications and even good deeds of obedience! The Takfir of the first
Khawarij was rooted in their beliefs, while the Takfir of the modern day
Takfiri extremists is political, conveniently and opportunistic. The one who
agrees with them, or they see his affiliation to them as beneficial, is
praised by them. Moreover, they frequently request him to talk about them and
to praise them, so that they can reach position with this praise in front of
the people. As for the one who disagrees with them, they lie about him, they
slander him, and they make Takfir on him. Following the methodology of Takfir,
explosions, exclusion and tyranny.
Their magazine Dabiq likewise reminds me of the message ''The guidance of the
Lord of the world'' by Abu AbduRahmaan Amin (Jamal Zitouni, leader of the GIA),
and this is a sign of collapse. And the bomb attack on the Ariha mosque after
it was liberated, killing the fasting Muslims in it, reminds me of the
massacre of Mohammed Abdullah al-Khilaifi and his men on praying Muslims in
the Ansar Sunnah mosque in Omdurman (Note: They killed at least 19 praying
Muslims in this attack on 19 September 1994 in Sudan. After that a similar
attack was carried out by Abbas al-Baqir Abbas form the same Takfir Wal Hijrah
group on praying Muslims of Ansar Sunnah in the Jarafa mosque on 8 December
2000, killing at least 22, also in Omdurman). After that they attacked a
guesthouse of Shaykh Usama bin Laden, may Allah have mercy upon him, in
Al-Khartoum.
And when Al-Khilaifi was asked about the reason why he attacked the Ansar
Sunnah mosque he said because it is a temple for polytheists. And when he was
asked why he attacked a guesthouse of Shaykh Usama bin Laden, may Allah have
mercy upon him. He answered, because he is the most misguiding for people. So
he was convinced that he should start with him. And in Peshawar the extremists
made Takfir on me because I did not make Takfir on the Mujahideen of
Afghanistan, then they made Takfir on Shaykh Abu Muhammad Al-Maqdisi, may
Allah protect him, because he did not make Takfir on me.
And these people claimed that they were on the methodology of Ahl Sunnah Wal
Jamah, and that they did not make Takfir on the basis of sins. Like the group
of Al-Baghdadi who claimed the same, who claim that they are on the
methodology of Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamah. While they make Takfir on people based on
fabrications, on lies, and on that which isn't something you can make Takfir
on, rather they even make Takfir on good deeds and following the Quran and
Sunnah. They for example made Takfir on Abu Saeed Al-Hadrami, may Allah have
mercy on him, because he took oaths of loyalty from FSA to wage Jihad. And
they made Takfir on me and claimed that I follow the majority and that I do
not make Takfir on the Tawagheet, because I supported the revolution of the
oppressed, and because I used soft speech towards the prisoner Muhammad Mursi,
while I was following the Quran and Sunnah in giving Dawah. But the real
reason for this slander was that I stood up in front of their pursuits, trying
to preserve the blood of Muslims.
And I have lived with the Takfiris in their different types in Egypt, until I
wrote a handwritten refutation against them in the 70's. They misuse the
enthusiasm of the youth, who reject corruption and deviation in Islam. So many
truthful ones who seek the truth join them. And this is a glad tiding, their
followers showed that many of them who join them leave them again after a
while. Moreover, many of those who left them are the most keen in holding
tight to the methodology of the Sunnah and are keen in preserving the
sanctuaries of Muslims after their previous experience. And this pushes us to
stay on the path of Dawah towards them, and show them the realities, and
expose the falseness of their media. Because no matter how showy and false the
media gets, it is not able to change the truths of the reality. Truthfulness
will stay truthfulness, and lies will stay lies, and loyalty will stay
loyalty, and treachery will stay treachery.
(Taken from the recent audio message 'Shaam – A trust on your necks' by
Syaikh Aiman Az-Zhawahiri)
Translated by: telegram.me/Al_Maqalaat
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments