US Presidency 2016: If Hillary Wins, Peace Postponed In West Asia, Israel Genocides in Palestine Gaza!
28 September 2016
By Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal
Obviously USA with its double-speak and double-standards cannot guarantee
peace for Mideast or any other region in the world. However, arrival of a
sincere and truly statesman like US president can be expected to sincerely
attempt a peaceful world. Certainly former foreign minister of USA Hillary
Clinton with her palms soaked in Arab blood is not a real stateswoman, though
she would pretend to be one. She can only guide the US military misadventures
in the energy rich hypocracies in Arab world
What the Republican Trump would do for or against the Palestinians if he
becomes US president is not a concern of Palestinians because generally the
Republican Party supports and promote Zionist rιgime in West Asia, but what
Hillary Clinton would do against the Palestinians indeed terrifies the people
of Palestine, especially women and children whose blood, along with
Palestinian lands, has been target of Israeli military and Mossad.
Hillary's election, therefore, is not a good thing for Palestine children
because Israel is keen to achieve total holocaust in Palestine so that they
could swindle their lands to create their fond greater Israel. .
Palestinians may have won defacto statehood at UN and thus legally Palestine
is a UN member state with full sovereignty but fanatic nuclear Israel behaving
like a fascist cum arrogant nation wanting to attack any nation in West Asia
with immunity, can attack it if USA continues to back at UN with its veto all
Zionist crimes against humanity.
Like any top US leader cutting across their capitalist bi-party politics, Mrs.
Hillary Clinton as US Secretary of State, like any other Jew in that country,
enjoyed her stay in Israel whenever she visited it for sumptuous launch with
Israeli leaders and declaring US support for Zionism and against besieged
Palestinians.
With two hardcore capitalist-imperialist agenda by two hardliners Republican
Donald Trump and democratic Hillary the Palestinians faced a worst ever
American electoral season. Though trump has already declared his thinking to
revise US policy for Mideast and neutralize its usual pro-Israeli policy and
thereby stopping extra funding for the Zionist regime with terror goods and
technology, Palestinians have kept their fingers crossed because if Trump is
indeed gets elected, which looks a near possibility, he could be manipulated
by the Israeli government and powerful Jewish lobbyists in Washington,
especially the all powerful American Israeli Public Affairs Committee's (AIPAC)
which almost controls the White House all the time and funds both parties at
polls.
Although Clinton holds the unprecedented distinction of being the only major
party nominee, man or woman, ever to have actually visited the Gaza Strip a
historic trip she made at her husband's side in the final weeks of 1998, when
US President Bill Clinton faced impeachment at home, she is deadly pro-Israel
and anti-Palestine. She talks about Israeli security but criticizes Palestine
for demanding equal security. She, like hardliner Republicans, calls the
besieged Palestinians the terrorists and never opened her sweet mouth to
condemn the routine Israeli aggression and terror attacks and genocides
committed inside Palestine.
Being a hardcore pro-Zionist Hillary Clinton would not stand for the human
rights of Palestinians. She would give the general drift of her Zionism
record-breaking military budget increases for Israel's war-making machine;
opposing the Goldstone Report into rights violations during the Gaza conflict;
criticising the United Nations for its votes against Israel; intelligence
sharing with Mossad; and so on. She promises, if elected she ''defend Israel
on the world stage'' by opposing ''anti-Israel bias'' in international forums
(the International Criminal Court and human rights venues), vowing the
Security Council will never help Palestine; and to ''stand up against'' the
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement, while cutting off efforts to
recognize Palestinian statehood.
Together during the first state visit by an American president to the occupied
territories they attended the opening of the new Gaza airport, leaving it to
Israeli control and hence off and on Israel shuts the airport, forcing
Palestinian youth to beg Israeli authorities to let them visit abroad through
Israeli airport. Of course most of the time Israeli regime denies permission,
arrest and harass the Palestinians. World is kept in darkness about how
Israeli treats Palestinians by US-Israeli media outlets. US government
pretends it does not see any of roguish attitudes of Israeli regime.
Trump having ''betrayed'' the hopes of the Zionist regime by saying he would
rethink its relations with Israel, Israeli leadership of illegal settlements
want Hillary to won so that they quickly can resume terror attacks on Gaza
strip, killing children which the so-called ''first even woman president of
USA would readily approve by sanctioning more money and terror goods for Tel
Aviv.
Israeli regime cannot keep the criminal Jewish flock together without
attacking and killing Palestinians.
Airport or any other important buildings are built in Gaza Strip, would be
blown to bits by Israeli warplanes sooner than later, the tower a smoking
ruin, the runways full of bomb craters. USA has given that destructive right
to Israel. In fact, no one in the US government raises a hint of objection to
the symbolic and the practical demolition of Palestinian aspirations to fly
free of the occupation Gulf State and German money had built the place- but
who cared if the Israelis wanted it destroyed?
Israeli enjoys special rights over Palestine territories. USA approves that
shamelessly.
Every US candidate makes pilgrimage to Israel to ensure Jewish vote bank in
USA and Hillary also said that the Americans love Israel more than the next
guy: it is a sloppy mess, with US politicians competing for AIPAC approval, by
kneeling to kiss the ring of a foreign power. Hillary out-did other
politicians in her fawning, gratuitously inserting the Zionist formula for
Jerusalem's subjugation in an official letter to an Orthodox Jewish union,
writing that she believed the city to be ''the eternal and indivisible
capital'' of Israel, while promising even to move the US embassy there from
Tel Aviv.
As a 2008 presidential candidate, her campaign extolled Israel's ''right'' to
an ''undivided Jerusalem as its capital''.
Many in USA and elsewhere wondered if the First Lady had been naive, or
manipulated her adoption of the language of Israeli conquest and annexation
stood in sharp contrast to her party, her husband's official position, and
international law. It also contradicted the US State Department's policy. If
she did not understand its dangerous implications, then her competency was in
question; otherwise, it represented a shift for the party, signaling quiet
abandonment of the Palestinians.
Hillary seems to prefer the latter, end Palestinians race with help from
Israeli military.
The Hillarian verbal formulation has long been a shibboleth of Israeli
expansionism Republicans in the Congress had passed a bill the Jerusalem
Embassy Act of 1995 ordering President Clinton to move the embassy, or face
budget consequences. However, the law contained a presidential waiver, and
Clinton invoked it to get out of complying. This grotesque pantomime has been
repeated every year for the past 20 years, as Congress renews the law, each
president opts out, and the embassy remains in Tel Aviv.
Money in US poll
US elections are all about money strength and ordinary people cannot even
dream of becoming US president even after millions of years. That is the
basics about capitalist p politics. Both national parties collect and spend
huge resources in the campaign. Also, Presidential campaigns in the USA are
often full of drama and chaos political theatre but it is usually
controlled chaos, which is carefully scripted by party officials.
To start with, Trump has thrown the Republican Party into an internal war over
what the party should stand for, with many Republicans still fighting to
replace him as their party's nominee. This presidential campaign has been
different, with Republican Party officials watching as Donald Trump, an
unpredictable reality TV star and businessman, took over the party to a path
paved by policies that defied typical conservative positions.
Beyond Trump's questionable conservative values, he has also raised concerns
because of his often violent rhetoric, particularly towards immigrants and
non-white communities. ''This message of economic anxiety, this message of
ethnic scapegoating, those two things being this confluence that provides a
real spark for potential violence in American society,
The billionaire businessman managed to rise from reality TV star to
presidential nominee. Donald Trump won more votes than any other candidate in
a Republican primary in US history. His rise was baffling, dramatic, and to
many, completely unexpected.
Trump rose to the top of his party not just by tapping into and exploiting
fears and anxieties over immigrants and Muslims, but also by speaking to some
of the real economic struggles of a section of the middle class that feels
like no one else has been listening to them. At a time when perhaps the most
''politically incorrect'' candidate in US history rises to the top of the GOP,
Trump's supporters talk about immigration, their place in America and why they
believe the anti-establishment politician will ''make America great again''.
Many Democrats say they've crossed party lines and put their faith in Trump to
resuscitate a dying coal industry and they feel that no one else is addressing
their economic concerns. Many US residents feel they are being squeezed by the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The United Technologies announced
in February that it was moving jobs to Mexico. As Trump railed against the
company's sister factory, Carrier, in speech after speech, we find that anger
over free trade and globalization has helped propel his unlikely candidacy.
As Americans prepare to elect a new president, media still explores the
fractures Donald Trump's nomination has exposed within the Republican Party
and the USA. He stands chance. As Donald Trump has taken the reins of the
Republic Party, a theme of campaign is the rise of the billionaire
businessman, from reality TV star to a populist who has managed to capture the
support of a large and often angry voter base.
Hillary Clinton can be expected as president to mount the ramparts of Fortress
Israel, and vigorously wave the flag more aggressively than Bush or Reagan,
or any president before her, portending hard times for Palestine.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments