Iran and Russia: Old Enemies, New Allies
07 September 2016
By Amir Taheri
''Our relations with Russia have assumed a strategic nature,'' says
Rear-Admiral Ali Shamkhani, Secretary-General of Iran's High Council of
National Security. ''In the context of the fight against common enemies, all
our bases are available to Russia.''
The historic statement last Tuesday came in response to a storm of protest in
Iran, including within the establishment, raised by the announcement in Moscow
that Russian heavy bombers were using the Iranian Air Base Nozheh, near
Hamadan southwest of Tehran, for attacks on targets in Syria.
''Iranian leaders were clearly embarrassed by the announcement in Moscow'',
says Nasser Zamani, an analyst of Iranian affairs. ''They know that Iranians
are extremely sensitive to their territory hosting any foreign power,
something that has not happened until now.''
However, it was not easy to organize a cover up when Russian President
Vladimir Putin is keen to show his government is now returning to the Middle
East as the major foreign power with influence.
Horus after the Moscow announcement, the issue was raised in the Islamic
Majlis by a couple of members. One of them, Muhamad Reza Falaht-Pisheh, argued
that the Russian military presence in Iran violated both the letter and the
spirit of the Islamic Republic's Constitution. In fact Article 146 expressly
forbids the use of Iranian territory by any foreign military ''even for
peaceful purposes'' such as relief for victims of natural disasters.
Trying to reduce tension, the Majlis Speaker Ali Ardeshir Larijani argued that
Iran had not ''granted'' Russia base but was allowing the Russian Air Force to
use Iranian facilities. To hammer in the point another Majlis member Borujerdi,
head of the National Security Committee, claimed that Russia ''was given
certain facilities'' with the approval of the High Council of National
Security (HCNS).
However, Article 176 of the Constitution which sets up the position and
responsibilities of the HCNS makes it clear that it does not have the power to
make such concessions to foreign powers. It can study possibilities of
cooperation and make recommendations which are not applicable unless approved
by the Council of Ministers, the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis) and
the ''Supreme Guide''. In this case none of those steps had been taken.
For over 200 years Ira's refusal to allow foreign military on its soil has had
major impacts on its foreign and domestic policies. In 1856-57, Iran ceded the
province of Herat, now part of Afghanistan, after being defeated by a British
expeditionary force. However, in the Treaty of Paris that ended the crisis,
Iran refused British demands for a military base in the Bushehr Peninsula.
In 1911 the Russians invaded the northern Iranian province of Gilan, seeking a
military base to control all coasts of the Caspian Sea. Again Iran, although
weak and confused as a result of a Civil War between the Constitutionalists
and the Absolutists backed by Moscow, refused to yield.
In 1921 the British sent an expeditionary force from Iraq through Iran to
Transcaucasia top back newly-emergent republics in Georgia and Armenia against
the new Bolshevik regime in Moscow. Iran, itself frightened of Bolshevik
regime, allowed the British the right of passage but refused to let them set
up base.
In the 1930s, Reza Shah, the founder of the Pahlavi Dynasty, developed close
ties with Nazi Germany against Iran's traditional enemies: Russia and England.
But even then he refused to allow Hitler to build a base to monitor, and when
the time came, disrupt British shipping in the Gulf to India.
In the 1950s Iran joined the Baghdad Pact with Turkey, monarchic Iraq and
Great Britain. Initially, the US had also been expected to join as part of the
US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles's ''Northern Tier'' strategy to throw
a ring around the Soviet Union. However, the Americans refused to become full
members for two reasons, both related to Iran. The Iranians would not allow
the US to build a base in their territory. Nor would they agree that Iranian
troops be put under foreign command in the context of the Baghdad Pact. (The
pact collapsed in 1958 when General Abdul-Karim Assam seized power in Iraq. It
was later renamed the Central Treaty Organization minus Iraq.)
During his brief premiership, Dr. Muhamad Mussadeq, the man appointed by the
Shah to carry out oil nationalization after its approval by the Majlis, the
Soviets did all they could to obtain a military presence in Iran at a time
when the Iranian mood was violently anti-British. Mussadeq formulated his
foreign policy as ''Negative Balance (''Al-Mowazanat Al-Manfiah) with the
slogan ''Neither East nor West.''
In the 1960s Iran emerged as one of the United States' closest allies and
remained so until 1979 when the mullahs seized power. Nevertheless, even then
Iranians did not allow the Americans to build bases in Iran
Seizing power in 1979 with support from Mussadeqists, Stalinists and a variety
of leftist groups, Khomeini's adopted Mussadeq's ''Neither East nor West''
slogan. His successor as ''Supreme Guide'', Ali Khamenei, dropped that slogan
earlier this year, replacing it with a new one: ''Looking East''.
The slogan has an echo of the Cold War when West and East blocs divided the
world. However, today, with the fall of the USSR, Russia is not to the east of
Iran, it is to the north. This does not indicate Khamenei's poor knowledge of
geography; it is a sign that he feels the old Cold War has returned in a new
paradigm, and that he must take sides.
''The Looking East strategy is a sort of guarantee,'' says Ali-Akbar Velayati,
a former Foreign Minister and current adviser to Khamenei. ''We know that the
old world order has been shattered and no one, even the wisest of men, knows
what is going to happen tomorrow. In times of uncertainty it is prudent to
have powerful ally.''
Velayati's attempt at casting Russia in the role of a strategic ally may be
premature, however. And some Iranian observers regard the current honeymoon as
tactical. ''Iran and Russia are working closely because both don't want their
side to be defeated in Syria,'' says Tehran University professor Sadeq
Ziba-Kalam. ''Also, both Tehran and Moscow are anti-American and hope to seize
the opportunity provided by Obama's retreat to fill the gap in the Middle
East. Russians using Iranian bases is a tactical move with limited objectives.
Others don't share that view.''The Russian bombers taking off from bases in
Iran may be tactical, but their effect is strategic,'' says Vali Nasr, a
former adviser to US President Obama and a long-time advocate in the US of the
''moderate'' Rafsanjani faction in Tehran.
For 36 years, Khomeinist mobs burned the United States' flag in public amid
shouts of ''Death to America!'' These days, however, it is the Russian flag
that is burned by protestors chanting ''Down with Russia!'' These small
demonstrations may prove to have little impact. But they indicate the presence
within the Iranian political culture of a strong streak of Russophobia.
Russophobia has a long history in Iran. It started with the wars that the
tsars launched against a weakened Persia from the late 18th century to 1830,
annexing large tracts of Iranian territory in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
In the Caucasus, through four decades of intermittent wars, Iran lost
Daghestan, Ossetia, Abkhazia, Georgia, Ajaria, Aran ( Now Azerbaijan) and
Armenia to Russia. In Central Asia, the Russians annexed such centers of
Persian culture as Bokhara, Samarkand and Merv.
In 1829, a mob attacked the Russian Embassy in Tehran, killing most of its
employees including the Minister Plenipotentiary, Alexander Griboidev whose
head was chopped off and displayed on a pie in the center of Tehran. . (Griboidev
was a poet and playwright, too!)
Peter the Great and Catherine the Great dreamed of annexing the whole of Iran
so that Russia could reach the warm waters of the Indian Ocean.
By mid-19th century, Moscow had turned the Caspian Sea, for centuries an
Iranian lake, into a Russian pond in which Iran was denied even a commercial
navy. Russia maintained a monopoly on the lucrative caviar trade until Iran
nationalized the industry in 1951.
In 1909, Russia signed a pact with Great Britain, another enemy of Iran at the
time, to divide it into two spheres of influence. Iran's newly created
constitutional government resisted that plot and reasserted what was left of
the nation's independence. Two years later, the Russians landed troops on the
Iranian side of the Caspian, in support of feudal chiefs and mullahs who
tried, and failed, to destroy the new constitutional government.
The Russians invaded again during the First World War and returned home only
after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.
In 1919, a contingent of Bolshevik ''military instructors'' arrived in Gilan,
on the Iranian side of the Caspian, to set-up a secessionist ''Republic of the
Jungle'' as part of Komintern's strategy under Grigori Zinoviev for ''setting
the East ablaze.'' When that attempt failed in 1922, the Bolsheviks signed a
treaty with Tehran under which Russia received the right to land troops in
Iran when and if it felt threatened by the presence of foreign forces.
By 1940, Russia had lost its overt influence in Iran while the NKVD, the
Soviet secret service, had acquired a clandestine presence by creating the
Tudeh (Masses) Party in Tehran, and the Democratic Sect, a secessionist
outfit, in the province of Azerbaijan.
A year later, Russian troops were back, this time in alliance with Britain,
with the aim of using Iran as ''a bridge of victory'' for supplying the Red
Army against Nazi invaders in Europe. (US forces joined the duo a bit later).
At the end of the war, Stalin refused to withdraw his troops from the Iranian
provinces of Azerbaijan and Kurdistan with the intention of turning them first
into independent entities and then annexing them to the USSR. However, Iran,
backed by the US that at the time had a monopoly on nuclear weapons, using the
threat of a regional war that an exhausted USSR could not contemplate, forced
Stalin to recall his armies
By the 1960s, the Soviet Union had become a marginal player in Iran. It tried
to pressure Iran to distance itself from the West by supporting radical Arab
regimes in Egypt, Libya, Syria and Iraq that waged a propaganda war against
the Shah's regime.
Playing the Russian card formed a major part of President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's strategy in what he sees as his Jihad to create ''a world
without America.'' Dreaming of an anti-American axis that includes China,
Russia, Iran, North Korea, Syria, the Sudan and Venezuela, Ahmadinejad has
gone out of his way to woo Moscow:
In 2005 Ahmadinejad declared that Iran recognized the abrogated treaties
with Russia as valid. This was seen as a diplomatic warning to the United
States not to take military action against the Islamic Republic because such a
move could lead to Russian military intervention.
In 2007, he withdrew Iranian support for Kosovo's independence, despite the
fact that 98 per cent of the newly created republic's inhabitants are Muslims.
Iran joined Russia in rejecting Kosovo's demand to become a member of the
United Nations.
Ahmadinejad abandoned Iran's policy of protecting refugees by handing over
to Russia scores of Chechen, Ingush and Daghestani fighters, all Muslims, who
had fled from Afghanistan after the fall of the Taliban. The previous Iranian
government under President Muhammad Khatami had allowed refugees who did not
wish to remain in Iran to travel to other Muslim countries or the West.
According to Chechen sources, more than 100 fighters handed over to Russia by
Iran were executed in 2006 and 2007.
Ahmadinejad has backed Russia's invasion of Georgia and its effective
annexation of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. This complemented his policy of
working with Russia and Armenia in Transcaucasia to limit US influence.
Ahmadinejad joined Russia in opposing US plans to build anti-missile shields
in Poland and the Czech Republic.
In 2012 Iran applied for the membership of the so-called Shanghai Group, a
regional alliance created by Moscow with China and the Central Asian
republics.
The coming to power of a pro-American group, known as ''New York Boys'',
under President Hasan Rouhani was initially seen as a coup for the Americans.
Now, however, it is clear the official government of the Islamic Republic has
little influence in shaping major aspects of foreign policy. That power lies
with Khamenei.
Reversing a previous policy of diversification, the Islamic Republic has
decided to grant most of the contracts for building 22 new nuclear power
stations to Russia. However, some observers believe the Russians may be
leading Iran up the garden path.
Ghulam-Reza Bagherzadeh, the long-serving head of Iran's nuclear program
shares that view. ''The Russians are playing the Iranian card to secure
concessions from the US and do not intend to let us have a credible nuclear
industry,'' he asserts.
Iran has also signed the biggest arms contract in the history of Russo-Iranian
trade for the purchase of S300 antiaircraft missile systems. Moscow started
installing the system in Iran last spring.
Pressured by Khamenei to reduce the number of Iranians studying in Western,
Indian and Chinese universities, the number of Iranians training in Russia has
increased fourfold. Russia is training hundreds of Iranian security personnel
and providing materiel used against demonstrators.
Some analysts claim the pro-Russian policy reflects the views of the ''Supreme
Guide'' Ali Khamenei. Muhammad Muhsin Sazgara, a former member of the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) who has defected to the US, claims that
Khamenei established ties with the KGB, the Soviet secret service, years
before the Khomeinist revolution. At the time the idea was that the Soviet
Union, being the only power standing up to the United States, would help
Khomeinists destroy Iran's pro-West regime.
According to that theory, Khamenei even spent a year, presumably 1974-5,
attending ''special courses'' in Moscow's Patrice Lumumba University that was
set up to train Third World revolutionaries. This, however, is hard to
substantiate because at the time Khamenei was an unknown figure in faraway
Khorasan while the Soviet Union had good relations with the Shah.
According to the analysis offered by Velayati, Khamenei believes that Russia,
though much weakened, could help the Islamic Republic destroy American
influence in the Middle East. Russian support for the Khomeinist regime may be
less solid than Sazgara and others claim. Nevertheless, the perception in Iran
is that Vladimir Putin's authoritarian regime is the principal foreign
supporter of the theocracy in Tehran. Burning the Russian flag is one way for
Iranians to send a message to Moscow.
It is too early to gauge the exact extent of Iran's pro-Russia turn.
Shamkhani's statements imply that Russia is now also able to use Iran's naval
bases in the Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to project power in the Arabian Sea,
the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean beyond.
With the fall of the USSR, the Russian navy has lost its global reach. In the
Far East it is frozen out of action for months for climatic reasons. In the
Mediterranean it has lost mooring rights in the former Yugoslavia and has been
reduced to a small presence in the Syrian port of Tarsus. The Russian Navy
enjoyed facilities in the Iraqi port of Um-Qasar, but that was lost after the
1991 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Russia also lost its naval and aerial
facilities on the South Yemeni island of Socotra which, when we visited it in
2008, offered nothing but ruins of abandoned bases.
Base facilities in Iranian waters could enable Russia to rebuild a genuine
blue-water navy worthy of a power with global pretentions. Russia would be
able not only to further weaken America's dwindling influence in the region
but could also forestall the emergence of China as a rival power in the
Euro-Asian landmass. This may be why Russia is joining Iran and India in
developing the massive Chahbahar trade and security ''hub'' on the Iranian
side of the Gulf of Oman. The ''hub'' would link Central Asia to the outside
world and counter the ''hub'' that China is building in Pakistani Gwadar, on
the Arabian Sea next door to Chahbahar.
In exchange, the Iranian regime hopes to break out of its regional isolation,
install client governments in Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut and terrorize
America's abandoned allies such as Egypt and Turkey into submission.
However, the Russo-Iranian alliance suffers from a fundamental weakness:
neither side trusts the other and neither could forget a history written in
conflict, war, violence and blood.
Amir Taheri was born in Ahvaz, southwest Iran, and educated in Tehran,
London and Paris. He was Executive Editor-in-Chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran
(1972-79). In 1980-84, he was Middle East Editor for the Sunday Times. In
1984-92, he served as member of the Executive Board of the International Press
Institute (IPI). Between 1980 and 2004, he was a contributor to the
International Herald Tribune. He has written for the Wall Street Journal, the
New York Post, the New York Times, the London Times, the French magazine
Politique Internationale, and the German weekly Focus. Between 1989 and 2005,
he was editorial writer for the German daily Die Welt. Taheri has published 11
books, some of which have been translated into 20 languages. He has been a
columnist for Asharq Alawsat since 1987. Taheri's latest book "The Persian
Night" is published by Encounter Books in London and New York.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments