07 September 2016
By Jacob G. Hornberger
Hillary Clinton's recent speech to the American Legion confirms the following:
If you have liked the last 16 years of Bush-Obama, you're going to love the
next four years under a Clinton presidency. Her definition of ''exceptionalism,''
''indispensability,'' and ''leadership'' means four more years of welfare, the
drug war, bureaucracy, rules and regulations, invasions, occupations,
regime-change operations, coups, support of dictatorships, torture, Guantanamo,
and ever-growing taxation, debt, and inflation to pay for it all.
It's fitting that Clinton is reaching out to neo-conservatives and
conservatives because like them, she conflates the federal government and,
specifically, the national-security state branch of the federal government —
with America the nation. She simply cannot separate out the two within her
mind, especially when she's talking about how exceptional and indispensable a
nation the United States is.
Let's keep in mind that the United States was founded on a federal
governmental structure that was entirely different from the structure that
Americans live under today.
There was no Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, farm subsidies, corporate
bailouts, Federal Reserve System, welfare, fiat (paper) money, drug laws,
alcohol laws, immigration controls, income taxation, and labor laws. There was
no IRS, Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Agriculture, Energy, Health
and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development,
Transportation, DEA, and most of the rest of the departments and agencies that
compose the welfare-state, managed-economy way of life that modern-day
Americans have.
There was also no Pentagon, CIA, NSA, or FBI. There was only a relatively
small army, given the deep antipathy that our American ancestors had toward
overgrown military establishments. There were no foreign interventions,
invasions and occupations of foreign countries (except the Mexican War),
foreign aid, support of foreign dictatorships, alliances with foreign regimes,
and assassination programs.
Whatever one might say about that type of federal governmental structure,
everyone would have to agree on one fundamental point: It was different. In
fact, it was unique — one of a kind. Never before in history had people
brought that type of governmental structure into existence. It was one that
both Democrats and Republicans believed in and favored.
That type of governmental structure — which obviously was extremely limited in
scope, revenue, size, and power — unleashed the country — that is, the private
sector — the American people. In a society in which the federal government
lacked the ability to play a large role, the standard of living of the country
began soaring. When government lacked the power to tax people's income, people
were going from rags to riches in one, two, or three generations, simply
through the power of saving money. New businesses were opening every day. New
inventions were constantly coming into existence. In a country where
government was precluded from helping the poor, there was the greatest
outpouring of voluntary charity that mankind had ever seen.
Not surprisingly, the American phenomenon startled the world. People
everywhere marveled. For one thing, they were shocked at the notion that
people could actually limit the power of their own government over their lives
and fortunes. For another thing, they had no idea that people could actually
live in a society where anyone could become prosperous and rich. They were
stunned that a nation could successfully avoid warfare for most of its
existence.
That's what caused people to look on America as exceptional. They saw a
limited-government republic and recognized that it was exceptional compared to
all other governments in the world. They saw the prosperity and charity that
characterized the country and viewed it as exceptional. And it was, indeed,
exceptional. Nothing like it had ever existed in history.
But as we all know, everything changed in the 20th century. America became a
welfare state and a warfare state, a way of life characterized by an
all-powerful federal government that wielded the unlimited power to tax,
borrow, and inflate to fund its ever-growing welfare-warfare state activities.
When Clinton, the neo-cons, and the conservatives describe America as
exceptional, they're not referring to the limited-government constitutional
republic on which America was founded and that remained in existence for over
a century. They're referring to the welfare state and the warfare state that
America has become.
But what's exceptional about a welfare state? Every country is the world is a
welfare state. Just look at Cuba, North Korea, China, Sweden, Norway, or
France.
What's exceptional about a government-managed economy? Every nation has one.
What's exceptional about drug laws? They exist everywhere, especially in
countries with totalitarian or authoritarian regimes. The Philippines comes to
mind.
And what's exceptional about a national-security state, which the federal
government became in the 1940s? The Soviet Union was national security state.
So are Cuba, North Korea, and communist China.
What Clinton, the neocons, and the conservatives have done is take the words
''exceptional'' and ''indispensable'' that correctly described America in,
say, 1890, and twisted those terms to describe the welfare-warfare state way
of life under which Americans now live, including all the welfarism, the
regulations, the bureaucracies, the drug war, and, of course, the perpetual
bombing, invasions, assassinations, invasions, occupations, coups, and support
of dictatorships.
For Americans who wish to restore America's exceptional and indispensable role
in the world, there is but one way to do that: Dismantle the welfare-warfare
state components of the federal government and restore a constitutionally
limited-government republic and a free-enterprise economic system to our land.
That's how the American people could, once again, lead the world to freedom,
peace, prosperity, and harmony.
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom
Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in
economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the
University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He
also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught
law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become
director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has
advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the
country as well as on Fox News' Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and
he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano's show
Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full
Context.
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom
Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in
economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the
University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He
also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught
law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become
director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has
advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the
country as well as on Fox News' Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and
he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano's show
Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full
Context.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments