31 October 2016
By Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal
Russia hopes the position it has assumed
now would help increase its diplomatic profile in Mideast and elsewhere. But
whether or not USA and Russia plays a joint war in Syria is not very clear as
yet For years since the
collapse of mighty Soviet Union, Russia has been trying to stay an equal power
to US super power and made policies to appease US capitalist system without
much success in coming closer to Washington, except a few ''adjustments'' with
regard to attack on Muslim nations like Syria. Nothing could help Moscow to
come to the close position it sought because USA denies that comfort zone not
only to the Kremlin but, for that matter, to any nation, including its closest
ally UK. Once it became apparent that It cannot be an equal power to equally
''share'' profits globally, Moscow adopted confrontational cum cooperative
policy towards USA but even that could not make Americans trust Russians.
Apparently, Russo-US relations are
strained, presumably, forever. USA remembers the Cold war more than Russia for
its negative consequences as Russia boldly threatened the US supremacy and
dominance. However, the mindset
of Cold war animosity in which they almost ''missed'' a nuke-missile war, is
too strong for both to completely get away from that ''proxy'' mindset.
Russian President Vladimir Putin
attempted a ''fresh'' start in bilateral ties when secret ''terrorists''
attacked New York as per the preplanned Sept-11 hoax agenda, but supporting
the so-called War in Terror'' but which in fact means a permanent war on Islam
until perhaps the religion of God (Prophet Muhammad's Islam) is gone –
factually many Muslim nations also lend support to the anti-Islamic war. That
only reveals the faith deficit among global Muslim rulers and leaders, mainly
in Arab world.
Russians seek to revive the old Soviet
or Russian Empire and Putin fits the Russian bill for a strong presidency to
challenge the USA and EU. In an address to Russia's parliament in 2005, Putin
famously declared the collapse of the Soviet Union as a ''major geopolitical
disaster'' and it is this notion – regret for what was lost and frustration
over what he and his compatriots see as the subsequent loss of international
standing for Moscow – that drives his thinking on foreign policy.
Russians are indeed proud of their
president. Russia's annexation of Crimea, and its war in the Donbas region of
Ukraine, etc have resurrected security anxieties in Europe not seen since the
Balkan conflicts in the 1990s but Russians feel safe and secured and equally
proud of their president because nobody can even think of attacking Russia. In
that sense Russia is a super power in its own security rights, though its
economy has been wrecked by the western sanctions. Since it is rich nation
traditionally, Russia is able to withstand all pressure tactics of NATO-USA.
Moscow's military intervention in Syria
– including devastating air strikes on rebel-held eastern Aleppo which have
killed many civilians – shifted the momentum in favour of its long-standing
ally in Damascus Bashar al-Assad who considers his own presidency the most
important factor and would see Syria in ashes in order to stay in power.
Though his regime is still mired in a vicious, multi-faceted five-year-old war
Assad doesn't think he should step aside and save Syria and its people. His
own life more precious than thousands of Syrians who have been slaughtered by
his military, USA, Russia and other anti-Islamic forces.
It is no coincidence that the growing
challenge of Russia's muscular policies overseas is happening at a time when
the US-led post-Cold War order has weakened, with the undermining of
institutions that have helped underpin it, like the EU and NATO. It is no
surprise that, according to US sources, Moscow has funded populist anti-EU
political parties and movements across Europe, including the National Front in
France, which is experiencing a surge in support.
Putin's geopolitical adventures have
proved popular with Russians still smarting over the shrinking of Moscow's
global clout along with the demise of the Soviet Union. Since the Crimea
takeover, public support for Putin and his foreign policy has remained high.
One poll shows Putin's approval rating has hovered between 80 to 90pc since
2014. Another survey found almost two out of five Russians believe the
government's primary foreign policy goal should be to bring back the
superpower status it had during the Soviet era.
Moscow oversees an economy that is
struggling because the existing model is considered by many to be no longer
fit for purpose. Without a more robust economic foundation, the gap between
what Russia aspires to and what is capable of being – both domestically and
internationally – will grow. Others argue that Putin's style of hard-headed
diplomacy mixed with military clout, while bringing him some successes in the
short-term, may prove more difficult to pursue in the long-term in a
multi-polar world shaped by more fluid and unpredictable dynamics than in the
past. Putin's presidential term
extends until 2018 and many observers argue that if he is to maintain his
momentum on the international stage – outmaneuvering Western rivals on certain
issues to applause back in Russia – and consolidate recent gains, it must be
bolstered by better economic strategy at home. The fact Putin is expected to
be re-elected in two years' time says much about his ability to play the
domestic scene. Whether he can continue to do so on the world stage is another
question.
USA and Russia are fighting for military
domination worldwide that began when Soviet Russia occupied Afghanistan and
USA used all powers it could muster to oust the Red Army from Afghanistan
which it later occupied on some false pretexts following the Sept-11 hoax,
meticulously engineered by anti-Islamic elements.
The research showed that respondents
believed the biggest obstacle to Russia becoming an even more powerful global
player was resistance from the USA and EU, a claim repeatedly echoed in
Russian state media. The obstacles to Russian strive for bigger status than
USA would remains in place may be not be easy because of counter measures by
the USA, EU and NATO. Comments 💬 التعليقات |