The Marriage Contract Was Done Via Video Phone, With The Wife Appointing One Of The Two Witnesses To Be Her Guardian (Wali)
Islamic Rulings -
Living Shariah Verdicts
Islamic Questions & Answers
My sister got married via video phone in the presence of her father and brother,
with them on one side, and the husband, two witnesses and the imam of the mosque
– who is like a registrar – on the other side. They were able to hear and see
one another, except for the wife; they could only hear her voice. There was no
deceit involved in this matter. The wife follows the Maaliki madhhab and the
husband follows the Hanafi madhhab. During the conversation to do the contract,
the wife, who was a divorcee, appointed one of the two witnesses to give her in
marriage by saying: I appoint So-and-so to give me in marriage to So-and-so –
namely her husband. That was in their presence of my father and with his
agreement. At that point the wakeel asked the husband: Do you accept marriage to
So-and-so? And he replied: Yes. After that the contract was registered with the
appropriate authorities, and there was a waleemah (wedding feast); in other
words, the marriage was publicized before consummation. A little girl was born
as a result of this marriage. Is this marriage contract valid, and what are the
implications of it?
Praise be to Allah.
Firstly:
It is valid to do the marriage contract via video phone, and it does not matter
if the woman is not seen; it is sufficient to hear her voice, if there is no
risk of mischief.
Please see the answer to question no. 105531.
Secondly:
In order for the marriage contract to be valid, it is stipulated that it be done
by the guardian (wali) of the woman or his proxy; the woman should not do the
marriage contract or appoint a proxy for it. This is the view of the majority of
scholars, with the exception of the Hanafis.
The marriage contract that is done by a proxy appointed by the woman to do it on
her behalf is only valid according to the Hanafi madhhab.
So long as the marriage contract was done according to an established madhhab,
it is not to be invalidated, especially since it is known in this case that the
father agreed to the marriage and was in fact present when the marriage contract
was done.
Thirdly:
In order for the marriage contract to be valid, it is essential that the
marriage contract be witnessed by two Muslim witnesses, and it is not valid for
the guardian (wali) to be a witness.
It says in Sharh Mukhtasar Khaleel by al-Kharashi (3/168):
It is not permissible for the wali to be a witness to the marriage contract of
the woman under his guardianship, even if there is someone else with him (as a
witness). End quote.
See the answer to question no. 194435.
In that question we pointed out that testimony is not limited to those who are
asked to be witnesses and sign the official papers; rather anyone who is present
when the marriage contract is done and is fit to give testimony is a witness.
Based on that, the imam of the mosque in this case may be considered a second
witness, and the marriage contract is valid; it does not matter that he was
acting as registrar.
Moreover, it is valid for the brother of the wife to be a witness to her
marriage; there is a difference of scholarly opinion as to whether it is valid
for her father to also be a witness.
It says in Sharh Mukhtasar Khaleel by al-Kharashi (7/180): The apparent meaning
of his words indicates that it is permissible for a brother to give testimony
for his brother, whether in the case of deliberate injury or otherwise, and
whether his testimony will raise his brother in honour and status or not, or
whether it will ward off harm from him or not… The words "whether his testimony
will raise his brother in honour and status or not" refer, for example, to his
testifying that he married someone by marriage to whom he would gain honour and
status because of her being an honourable woman. End quote.
See the answer to question no. 215137.
Conclusion:
The marriage contract is valid, praise be to Allah.
And Allah knows best.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add Comments